Part I. Reviewers’ comments to the editing office.
An article to “Papers of Students’ Scientific Movement of UJK in Kielce” | |
Title of the article reviewed. | |
Name and surname of the Reviewer (with affiliation) | |
Date of writing the review |
Reviewer’s recommendation*:
- The article is accepted for publication, without changes
- The article is accepted for publication, after introducing the changes indicated.
- The article may be published only after introducing the major changes and additions.
- The article is not accepted for publication. *
*Underline the correct option.
Evaluation of the article
Very good | Good | Average | Very Low | |
Originality of the topic | ||||
Cognitive value | ||||
Substantive correctness | ||||
Compositional correctness | ||||
Stylistic correctness |
Part II. Reviewer’s comments to the Author:
Reviewer’s signature
…………………………………