Part I. Reviewers’ comments to the editing office.
| An article to “Papers of Students’ Scientific Movement of UJK in Kielce” | |
| Title of the article reviewed. | |
| Name and surname of the Reviewer (with affiliation) | |
| Date of writing the review | |
Reviewer’s recommendation*:
- The article is accepted for publication, without changes
- The article is accepted for publication, after introducing the changes indicated.
- The article may be published only after introducing the major changes and additions.
- The article is not accepted for publication. *
*Underline the correct option.
Evaluation of the article
| Very good | Good | Average | Very Low | |
| Originality of the topic | ||||
| Cognitive value | ||||
| Substantive correctness | ||||
| Compositional correctness | ||||
| Stylistic correctness |
Part II. Reviewer’s comments to the Author:
Reviewer’s signature
…………………………………